Sunday, January 27, 2013

North: Changing the guard - Conservative News

North: Changing the guard - Conservative News

 

North: Changing the story; Changing the guard

North: Changing the story; Changing the guard
Secretary of State Hillary R. clinton
WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is changing the guard. Minutes after the president retook the oath of office, he formally submitted nominations for his new secretary of state, secretary of defense and CIA director.
Two days later, remnants of red, white and blue inaugural bunting, bleachers and security fences were still up at the U.S. Capitol and along Pennsylvania Avenue when Congress came back to “work.” Temporary barricades, snow fence, partially disassembled Jumbotrons and hundreds of miles of cables and wires — the detritus of “the longest inaugural parade in history” — didn’t deter our elected representatives from “investigating” the Sept. 11, 2012, murders of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya, and conducting “hard-hitting, fact-finding” confirmation hearings for the new guardians of our national security.
Print pundits, talking heads and bloggers lined up to explain how members of relevant committees in our House of Representatives — and even the Democratic-controlled Senate — would grill Secretary of State Hillary R. Clinton and finally get to the bottom of what happened in Benghazi.
Washington-watchers and other navel gazers predicted that Sen. John F. Kerry would be tested about his false congressional testimony in 1971, when he accused those of us who served in Vietnam of routinely committing atrocities — murder, rape, pillage and ravaging South Vietnam “in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan.”
Nothing of the sort occurred. The Clinton and Kerry hearings were little more than poorly scripted farce. They produced little in the way of new information — no plans for making us safer, no fact finding, no apologies and no indication that anyone will be held accountable for incompetence, misfeasance or malfeasance in managing our affairs of state.
After telling the committees that she was responsible for protecting American citizens, diplomats and interests around the world, Clinton sought to mitigate any culpability for what happened last September — or last week. She explained that we were “woefully unprepared” and “surprised” by the bloody tumult in the Middle East and Africa. “When I was here four years ago, testifying for my confirmation, I don’t think anybody thought that Mubarak would be gone (or that) Gadhafi would be gone.”
She also pointed out how busy she has been — even before catching the flu, suffering a concussion and having to recover from a blood clot. When asked why she hadn’t seen messages warning about deteriorating security in Libya, she pointed out that there simply wasn’t enough time to read all the cables from overseas flooding into her Foggy Bottom office.
“They are all addressed to me,” she said.
Responses such as that beg the question, “Where were you, and what were you doing while Africa and the Middle East were going to hell in a handbasket?” It turns out the answer is in a speech Clinton gave at the Newseum last November.
Just weeks after Benghazi, she congratulated herself on being America’s most traveled secretary of state — 112 countries and 956,000 miles. That’s a whole lot of Ambien and a Keystone XL pipeline full of jet fuel.
She calls it “shoe-leather diplomacy,” and in her Newseum remarks, she stressed the importance of international travel in representing the interests of t
he American people. In that, she’s spot on.
Throughout our history, secretaries of state have traveled overseas to open new markets for American products and expand trade. They have negotiated peace among warring countries, forged alliances of strategic importance and created opportunity for American citizens and U.S. businesses in places that benefit our nation. To illustrate her point, she proudly told the audience that she was the first U.S. secretary of state to visit — hold on to your seat — Togo.
No, that’s not a typo. Togo. With remarkable bravado, Clinton explained her achievement: “No secretary of state had ever been to Togo before.” The crowd applauded.
Some foreign policy experts who’ve spent their careers studying international affairs might say, “Well, there’s a reason for that.” Togo is a disease-infested country of 7 million, with no strategic importance to the United States. Well, if that’s what you are thinking, you are wrong.
According to Clinton, going to Togo had “a real strategic purpose.” Her visit didn’t result in new trade agreements or access for U.S. forces contending with an explosion of radical Islam in sub-Saharan Africa. But she pointed out that while she was there, Togo held one of the rotating seats on the U.N. Security Council. And, as our most traveled secretary of state explained, when “you look at the voting dynamics in key international institutions (such as the U.N. Security Council), you start to understand the value of paying attention to these places.”
There you have it, a real record of accomplishment. As the New Guard — Kerry, Chuck Hagel and John Brennan — assumes the watch in Washington, keep your expectations low. The new crowd undoubtedly will live down to them.
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNDOUBTEDLY, they're wasting their money, time and energy putting together a Super Pac for this lying aider and abettor to run in 2016.   We all know Qadaffi was cooperating; he was NOT about to use WMD on his own people, as his arms status was well kept and monitored, and NATO knew this, despite going along with the air drone strikes, this Kommisar in Chief finally sent to take out Qadaffi's supporters facilitating his demise, as he stood in the way of the complete Arab Spring, which was the take over by the Muslim Brohood, and not the democracy adoring one that the people were hallucinating about.  The Jihadists, the radical extremists, brutal and barbaric killers and controllers were ready to step in, and Qadaffi warned of this, yet unfortunately his past trespasses diminished his credibility or demand as a trusted ally.   Shame, shame on you, Hillary, for taking it for the Evil Team, instead of standing up for your Country who stood up for you.   The Home Team will win, eventually.  Evil NEVER prevails forever.  And it's been close to forever, which occurs sometime after mid April.  Arm up and hold on to the ones you've got.  The time to rid ourselves of the tyrannical lot will be here sooner than later. 

Friday, January 18, 2013

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings says he's all-in on Obama's gun control agenda | Todd J. Gillman Columns - Texas Watch - News for Dallas, Texas - The Dallas Morning News

Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings says he's all-in on Obama's gun control agenda | Todd J. Gillman Columns - Texas Watch - News for Dallas, Texas - The Dallas Morning News

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/columnists/todd-j-gillman/20130118-dallas-mayor-mike-rawlings-says-he-s-all-in-on-obama-s-gun-control-agenda.ece


YOU SUCK DOUCHEBAG, TRAITOR, FRAUD, You're outnumbered and the legislation to ban the ban is already in place, IDIOT.  Too late to suck off Obama, you epic sleaze monger.


Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings says he's all-in on Obama's gun control agenda

 28 9
 
  Comments (31)A Text Size  
 Michael Ainsworth/Staff Photographer
Dallas Mayor Mike Rawlings addresses the media about recent domestic violence attacks, during a press conference Monday in the Flag Room at Dallas City Hall. Rawlings issued an emotional plea to the men of the city to stop domestic violence, which police Chief David Brown has said is directly related to an increase in homicides in the city in 2012. 
WASHINGTON – Mike Rawlings, mayor of Dallas and gun owner, is endorsing the president’s demand for a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines. He’s especially keen on universal background checks for gun buyers.
“We already say we can’t own Stinger rockets. So the question is where does the line go? And The line being at semi-automatics is the right place,” Rawlings said Friday over breakfast two blocks from the White House. “The proposals that the president has put on the table are solid and I support them. … We’re going to have to throw everything against the wall.”
Common sense suggests when it comes to preventing massacres such as the one in Newtown, Conn., last month, this is no time to be an “ideologue,” Rawlings said.
He embraces the holistic approach outlined by President Barack Obama earlier this week: attention to mental health and education, to violence in movies and video games, and also to weapons themselves.
“There’s no question that guns play a part of that,” Rawlings said.
“The big headline for me after Newtown was really coming to the realization that our culture of violence has gotten way out of line, way out of hand,” referring to the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary that left 20 children and a half-dozen educators dead.
The crackdown on weapons proposed by Obama and the task force led by Vice President Joe Biden has drawn a fierce pushback from the NRA and its allies, including many Republicans in Congress from Texas. Rawlings doubts that his support -- expressed between meetings at the annual U.S. Conference of Mayors gathering -- will change that.
“People have got their minds made up. All I’m speaking for are the citizens of Dallas,” he said.
Many will surely disagree. Texas is a hotbed of gun ownership, and even in a Democratic-leaning city and county, there would be heavy objection to tighter regulations.
Rawlings isn't floating any new city ordinance to crack down on guns or gun owners. But he wants to help move the national agenda forward, he said, even if his voice is drowned out by those at the White House, Congress and NRA.
“I am a major supporter of responsible gun ownership. I’m a gun owner. Most of Dallas is major gun owners.” But, Rawlings said, “99 percent of my friends and my associates who own guns want to do it in a common-sense manner.”
Last week, Rawlings held an emotional news conference at City Hall decrying domestic abuse and the general culture of violence. He briefly suggested that Dallas might ban gun shows from the city’s convention center, which hasn’t hosted such events in a decade. That quickly fell apart, as Attorney General Greg Abbott threatened to take on cities banning gun shows.
But until Friday morning he had kept his options open on the larger gun control debate raging in Washington -- taking time, he said, to consider the arguments.
“Which side am I on in this thing? I’m on the side of universal background checks and minimizing these magazines. This is a common sense approach,” he said. “I’m most passionate about magazines. There’s no reason for a 30-round magazine. What the right number is, I don’t know.”
He added: “And I get this from all my friends that are gun owners. They say we don’t need that many” rounds in a magazine.
Dallas, thankfully, hasn’t seen mass shootings of the sort in Newtown and Aurora, Colo. Dallas’ gun violence is typically more “intimate and individual,” the mayor said, but that’s no reason for Texans to ignore the very real problems elsewhere.
“This is a national debate that we’re dealing with. This should not be pro-gun, or anti-gun,” he said. “The argument that suddenly you’re against the Second Amendment holds no water with me. I’m pro- the Second Amendment.”
Mayors, with a first-hand view of gun violence, have often pushed for stricter measures. The national group has backed gun control for more than 40 years, and its current president, Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter, has been outspoken for Obama's agenda. Biden and New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, another vocal advocate of gun control, addressed the group this week.
Rawlings said he’s yet to hear a “panacea” for gun violence, including the Obama plan. But to him, that’s no reason to fail to tighten access to weapons that lend themselves to mass killing.
“When I’ve got a huge problem, anything that will make a difference, any small movement, helps move this ahead,” he said. “We’re talking about for the next decades, here, not just next year. You don’t turn this ship of violence around overnight. But we’ve got to take any actions we can on this.”
Follow Washington Bureau Chief Todd J. Gilllman on Twitter at @toddgillman.
TOP STORIES

MILLER: Tax dollars for gun control - Washington Times

MILLER: Tax dollars for gun control - Washington Times

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/18/tax-dollars-for-gun-control/

Sleazy mother fucker


MILLER: Tax dollars for gun control

Sneaky executive order bankrolls anti-Second Amendment propaganda

The directives on gun violence President Obama signed Wednesday were meant to seem harmless. A closer look at the president’s first memorandum reveals it to be a sneaky assault on congressional authority in order to fund gun-control propaganda.
Getting this done has been on the White House “to do” list for some time. In his 2013 budget submission, Mr. Obama deleted the prohibition that has been in effect since 1995 on the use of federal funds to advocate or promote gun control.
Mr. Obama is trying to steamroll the Democratic and Republican majorities that kept the ban intact by labeling the advocacy as research. “While year after year, those who oppose even modest gun-safety measures have threatened to defund scientific or medical research into the causes of gun violence, I will direct the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to go ahead and study the best ways to reduce it,” said Mr. Obama.
Under the terms of the memo, CDC may “sponsor” another entity to conduct the research, which is a handy way of funneling taxpayer cash to sympathetic gun-control groups.
Earlier this week, anti-gun activists, including New York City MayorMichael R. Bloomberg, spent a lot of time at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore discussing how the government-spending prohibition was hampering their plans.
Daniel Webster, director of the Center for Gun Policy and Research at the school, backed the president’s plan. “I agree that the CDC should be free to fund high-quality research into the causes and solutions to gun violence, one of the leading causes of premature mortality in the U.S. that affects not only deaths and injuries, but mental health as well,” he told The Washington Times.
Congress clamped down on the spending after President Clinton used the CDC and National Institutes of Health to create material advancing his theme of treating gun ownership as a public health issue, rather than a constitutional right. Millions in taxpayer funds were blown on junk science, such as $2.6 million used to determine if teenagers who are shot are more likely to have been drinking and carrying a gun. An additional $2 million went to figure out whether moving bars and liquor stores would prevent gun violence in communities.
By calling gun violence a “public health crisis” on Wednesday, Mr. Obama echoed Mr. Clinton’s model. It’s a move that could cost lives, as shifting funding away from fighting disease creates severely misplaced priorities. In 2010, 780,213 Americans died from cardiovascular disease and 574,743 from cancer, compared with 11,078 firearm homicides.
Under the Bush administration, the CDC already conducted a two-year independent study of the laws, including bans on specified firearms or ammunition; gun registration; concealed-weapon carry; and zero-tolerance for firearms in schools. The scientists concluded in 2003 that there was “insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence.”
Congress must reassert itself and override this executive action so that more tax dollars aren’t wasted. If Mr. Bloomberg wants more propaganda, he can pay for it out of his own deep pockets.
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.



Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/18/tax-dollars-for-gun-control/#ixzz2IMrnNqy3
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter





Newsweek revels in Obama cultism with creepy ‘second coming’ Inauguration cover | Twitchy

Newsweek revels in Obama cultism with creepy ‘second coming’ Inauguration cover | Twitchy

http://twitchy.com/2013/01/18/newsweek-revels-in-obama-cultism-with-creepy-second-coming-inauguration-cover/



Newsweek revels in Obama cultism with creepy ‘second coming’ Inauguration cover

First the angel Obama-el got his gay-lo from Newsweek, and now, in the creepy 2013 Inauguration issue, he’s the second coming.
Framing President Obama as our lord and savior isn’t surprising. We’re more shocked by the news that Newsweek still has covers after killing its print publication. But that doesn’t make it any less creepy and cult-like.
Hey, Newsweek knows its readers. (We think “readers” with an “s” is accurate, but our data may be stale.)
Good thing Newsweek had no credibility to lose! [Update: It's kind of hilarious that Newsweek's editors think this kind of trolling will result in increased readership.]
Glad you asked. Here’s Newsweek’s 2005 “Inaugural Issue”:
bush-newsweek
What, no cloven hooves?